|
In March of 2002, the State
of Florida qualified a group of Port St. Lucie investors to recover $100,000.00
from Florida Guaranty Fund for fraudulent activity of a broker
View
PDF version of this document
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND SECURITIES REGULATION
IN RE:
Claims of Joseph T. Barone and Mary G. Barone, JTWROS; The Caries
H. Klein & Gertrude A. Klein Living Trust, Charles H. Klein and
Gertrude A. Klein, Trustees; Janice W. Kuebler and Albert Kuebler;
The Leenher Family Trust, Neil R. Leenher, Trustee; The Sylvia and
Julian Lukowski Living Trust; Frank S. Scirrottto; Raymond Waite
and Lorraine Waite, individually and as trustees under that certain
trust dated June 19, 1990; and the Gene Wink and Beverly Wink Living
Trust against
EDWARD L. BATES
CRD No.: 1815183;
VICTOR VEROLA
CRD No.: 844714; and
GREAT AMERICAN FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC.
CRD No.: 14108;
Respondents.
___________________________/ |
Administrative Proceeding
No. DBF 3255-S-05/01 |
NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER FINAL ORDER APPROVING RECOVERY
FROM THE SECURITIES GUARANTY FUND AND NOTICE OF RIGHTS
The State of Florida, Office of Financial Institutions and Securities Regulation
of the Financial Services Commission of the Department of Financial Services
(the “Office”), being authorized and directed to administer and
to accept and pay claims against the Securities Guaranty Fund (“the Fund”),
codified in Sections 517.131 and 517.141, Florida Statutes, does hereby enter
a Notice of Intent to Enter a Final Order approving the applications of Joseph
T. Barone and Mary G. Barone, JTWROS (“Barone”); The Charles H.
Klein & Gertrude A. Klein Living Trust, Chareles H. Klein and Gertrude
A. Klein, Trustees (“Klein”); Janice W. Kuebler and Albert Kuebler
(“Kuebler”); The Leenher Family Trust, Neil R. Leenher, Trustee
(“Leenher”); The Sylvia and Julian Lukowski Living Trust (“Lukowski”);
Frank S. Scirrottto (“Scirrotto”); Raymond Waite and Lorraine Waite,
individually and as trustees under that certain trust dated June 19, 1990 (“Waite”);
and the Gene Wink and Beverly Wink Living Trust (collectively “Claimants”)
for payment from the Fund for violations of the Florida Securities and Investor
Protection Act by respondents Victor Verola (“Verola”) and denying
the applications as to respondent Edward L. Bates (“Bates”) and
Great American Financial Network, Inc. (“Great American”).
The Fund is disbursed as provided in Section 517.141, Florida Statutes, to
a person who is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to have suffered
monetary damages as a result of a dealer, investor advisor, or associated person
having violated Sections 517.07 or 517.301, Florida Statutes, subject to the
waiver provisions of Section 517.131 (2), Florida Statutes.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Under the provisions of
the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act (the “Act”),
the Office is charged with the responsibility and duty of administering the
fund, which includes the duty to approve or deny applications for payment from
the Fund, as set forth in Section 517.141(3)(a), Florida Statutes.
2. Great American was registered
pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, CRD No. 1669381, from November 1,
1983 to December 31, 1998.
3. Bates was registered pursuant
to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, CRD No. 1815183, from May 24, 1998, to June
18, 1999.
4. Verola was registered pursuant
to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, CRD No. 844714, from July 20, 1979,
to January 28, 1997.
5. On December 31, 1998, the
Department of Banking and Finance (the “Department”), statutory
predecessor to the Office by §20.121, Fla. Stat., issued an Administrative
Complaint for Entry of Cease and Desist Order Imposing Sanctions and Notice
of Rights, DOAH Case number 99-0634 (the “Administrative Complaint”),
against respondents and others, arising from respondents’ dealing With
Claimants and others while registered with the Department, and alleging violations
of 517.07 and 517.301, Fla. Stat.
6. On September 3, 1998, the
Department entered its Final Order as to allegations against respondent Victor
Verola in the Administrative Complaint, pursuant to a stipulation and consent
in which Verola neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing.
7. On January 1, 2000, the
Department entered its Final Order as to allegations in the Administrative
Complaint against respondents Bates and Great American, following trial, which
Final Order determined that while registered with the Department, Bates and
Great American both violated §517.07, FIa. Stat., by engaging in the sale
of unregistered securities, and that Bates and Great American both violated §517.301,
Fla. Stat., by employing a scheme to defraud investors, including Claimants,
by persuading Investors to purchase the unregistered securities.
8. On or about April 30, 2001,
the Office received from Claimants’ attorney Jeffrey P. Coleman, Esq.,
a letter requesting payment from the Securities Guaranty Fund. With the letter,
Claimant also included:
8.1. A copy of an Amended Complaint, in the
Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Florida, No. 98-788-CA-I 7, in which Claimants
are the plaintiffs and respondents Great American, Bates and Verola, among
others, were defendants, and requesting damages arising from the fraudulent
sales to Claimants of unregistered securities in the amounts as follows:
8.1.1. Barone $30,000
8.1.2. Klein $209,000
8.1.3. Kuebler $15,597
8.1.4. Leenher $30,000
8.1.5. Lukowski $105,000
8.1.6. Scirrotto $25,000
8.1.7. Raymond Waite individually and jointly with Lorraine Waite
$179,341
8.1.8. Lorraine Waite $13,828
8.1.9. Wink $266,000
8.2. A copy of the Final Order by the Department
as set forth in paragraph 7, above.
8.3. Copies of a Proof of Claim filed
for each of the Claimants in the bankruptcy of respondent Verola, setting
forth the amounts in 7.1 above for each of the Claimants, but also itemizing
recovery by Claimants, as follows:
8.3.1. Barone $2,016.74
8.3.2. Klein $0
8.3.3. Kuebler $0
8.3.4. Leenher $0
8.3.5. Lukowski $19,800
8.3.6. Scirrotto $0
8.3.7. Raymond Waite individually and jointly with Lorraine
Waite $0
8.3.8. Lorraine Waite $0
8.3.9. Wink $6,600
8.4. Copies of various newspaper and internet
articles indicating that both respondent Bates and respondent Verola had
been criminally charged arising from their transactions with Claimants.
9. On or about May 16, 2001,
in State v. Bates, Nineteenth Circuit Court #2001-71 5-CF, respondent
Bates was convicted of the felony of engaging in “boiler room sales” in
violation of §517.312(1), Fla. Stat., by obtaining money or property of
an aggregate value exceeding $50,000 from five or more persons, which conviction
includes as a predicate a violation of §517.301, FIa. Stat., and Bates
was ordered to make restitution to, among others, the Claimants.
10. On or about November 21, 2001, in State v.
Verola, Nineteenth Circuit Court #2001-771 -CF, respondent Verola was
convicted of the felony of engaging in “boiler room sales” in
violation of §517.312(1), Fla. Stat., by obtaining money or property
of an aggregate value exceeding $50,000 from five or more persons, which
conviction includes as a predicate a violation of §517.301, Fla. Stat.,
and Verola was ordered to make restitution to, among others, the Claimants.
11. On or about May 8, 2002, the Office
received from Claimant’s attorney Jeffrey P. Coleman, Esq., a letter
which responded to the October 22, 2001, inquiry by the Office requesting additional
information. With the letter, Claimant included all materials previously sent
on April 30, 2001, and a copy of a Discharge of Debtor as to respondent Verola,
entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida,
Case Number O0-31318-SHF.
12. On or about August 12, 2002, the Office
received from Claimant’s attorney Jeffrey P. Coleman, Esq., another letter.
With the letter Claimant included an Order of Stay Due to Bankruptcy As to
All Pending Claims and Directing Clerk to Close File as to Claimants’ civil
suit described in 8.1, above.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
13. The requirements for perfecting a
claim to the Fund are found in Sections 517.131 and 517.141, Florida Statutes.
14. Section 51 7.131(3) provides:
(3) Any person is eligible to seek recovery from the Securities Guaranty
Fund if:
(a) Such person has received final judgment
in a court of competent jurisdiction in any action wherein the cause of action
was based on a violation of those sections referred to in subsection (2).
(b) Such person has made all reasonable searches and inquiries to ascertain
whether the judgment debtor possesses real or personal property or other
assets subject to being sold or applied in satisfaction of the judgment,
and by her or his search the person has discovered no property or assets;
or she or he has discovered property and assets and has taken all necessary
action and proceedings for the application thereof to the judgment, but the
amount thereby realized was insufficient to satisfy the judgment. To verify
compliance with such condition, the department may require such person to
have a writ of execution be issued upon such judgment and may further require
a showing that no personal or real property of the judgment debtor liable
to be levied upon in complete satisfaction of the judgment can be found.
(c) Such person has applied any amounts recovered from the judgment debtor,
or from any other source, to the damages awarded by the court.
(d) The act for which recovery is sought occurred on or after January 1,
1979.
(e) The department waives compliance with the requirements of paragraph
(a) or paragraph (b). The department may waive such compliance if the dealer,
investment adviser, or associated person which is the subject of the claim
filed with the department is the subject of any proceeding in which a receiver
has been appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction. If the department
waives such compliance, the department may, upon petition by the debtor or
the court-appointed trustee, examiner, or receiver, distribute funds from
the Securities Guaranty Fund up to the amount allowed under s. 517.141. Any
waiver granted pursuant to this section shall be considered a judgment for
purposes of complying with the requirements of this section and of s. 517.141.
15. Based upon the foregoing Statement
of Facts, the Office concludes that the Claimants have satisfied the requirements
in Section 517.131, Florida Statutes, as to respondent Verola in that:
15.1. The Claimants have demonstrated that Claimants purchased
securities from respondents Great American, Bates and Verola in a concerted
scheme, when each of the respondents was registered with the Office.
15.2. The Claimants have demonstrated that Claimants’ purchases
of securities from the respondents involved violations of §§ 517.07
and 517.301, Fla. Stat., in that the Office made that determination in litigation
with respondents Bates and Great American, and in that both respondent Verola
and respondent Bates were criminally convicted for conduct where a necessary
element of such conviction was proof of fraudulent conduct in connection
the sale of a security.
15.3. The Claimants have demonstrated compliance with §§ 517.131(3)(a)
and (b), Fla. Stat., through waiver pursuant to §517.131(3)(e), Fla.
Stat., in that Claimants have demonstrated that Verola, “the subject
of the claim,” is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings, thus preventing
further efforts to obtain a judgment and enforce that judgment against Verola.
15.4. The acts for which Claimants seek recovery occurred after
January 1, 1979.
16. Based upon the foregoing Statement
of Facts, the Office concludes that the Claimants have not satisfied the requirements
in Section 517.131, Florida Statutes, as to respondents Great American and
Bates, in that Claimants have failed to demonstrate that either respondent
Great American or respondent Bates “is the subject of the claim filed
with the department [and] is the subject of any proceeding in which a receiver
has been appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
17. Each Claimant is limited to recovering
.the amount equal to the unsatisfied portion of any judgment against respondent
Verola or $10,000, whichever is less, as set forth in Section 517.141(1), Florida
Statutes.
18. The total claims against respondent
Verola may not exceed $100,000, and all claims will be prorated based upon
the ratio that the person’s claim bears to the total claims filed, as
set forth in Section 517.141(2), Florida Statutes.
19. Section
51 7.141(3), Florida Statutes, provides that no payment from the Fund shall
be made until two (2) years after the first claim has been determined by the
Office to be eligible for payment from the fund. This subsection further provides
that any additional claims or potential claims filed with or approved by the
Office during the two year period shall also be considered by the Office and
provision made for further prorations concerning such additional claims, if
any, two (2) years hence.
20. Since there are not such prior claims
approved as final orders against respondent Verola, it is the conclusion of
the Office that no payment shall be made in connection with any claim made
against respondent Verola until two years from the date of the Final Order
regarding respondents in this matter, that is, two years following the date
of the Final Order adopting this Notice of Intent.
PROPOSED FINAL ORDER
Upon due consideration of the factual statement set forth above and the law
applicable thereto, NOTICE is hereby given that the Office intends to and will
issue a Final Order substantially as follows, subject only to the Notice of
Rights attached and made a part of this Notice of Intent:
1. The Office hereby grants
each Claimant’s claim in the amount of up to $10,000 due to the conduct
of respondent Victor Verola;
2. No payment from the fund
shall be made until two (2) years from the date of entry of the first Final
Order regarding respondents:
3. Upon expiration of such
period, provided that no further claims are duly received or approved by
final order by the Office alleging violations of the Act by Victor Verola,
and subject to further proration and limitation as may be required by Section
517.141 (3) and (4), Florida Statutes, the Office shall pay each Claimant the
amount of up to $10,000 from the Fund for each claim against respondent Victor
Verola;
4. Claimant
shall assign any right, title, and interest in the debt to the extent of and
prior to any payment by the Office from the Fund.
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Notice is hereby given that a party may request a hearing on the Notice of
Intent to Enter a Final Order Approving Recovery From the Securities Guaranty
Fund to be conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 120.57, Florida
Statutes. Requests for such a hearing must comply with the provisions of Florida
Administrative Code 28-1 06.201, and must be filed with:
Agency Clerk
Office of Financial Institutions and Securities Regulation
Fletcher Building, #526
200 East Gaines Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0379
within twenty-one (21) days after the party receives a copy of this Notice
of Intent to Enter a Final Order Granting Recovery From the Securities Guaranty
Fund and Notice of Rights, otherwise the party shall be deemed to have waived
all rights to such hearing. Should a party request such a hearing, the party
is further advised that at such hearing the party will have the right to offer
testimony, either written or oral; to call and cross-examine witnesses; and
to have subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum issued on the party’s behalf.
Pursuant to Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, please be advised that mediation
is not available.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing
Notice of Intent to Enter Final Order Granting Recovery from the Securities
Guaranty Fund and Notice of Rights were duly sent by U.S. Certified Mail, Return
Receipt Requested, to the following:
Victor Verola, DOC#60981, Loxahatchee Correctional Institution, 230 Sunshine
Road, West Palm Beach, FL 33411;
Edward Lee Bates, DOC#K60318, Quincy Annex, 2225 Pat. Thomas Parkway, Quincy,
FL 32351;
Great American Financial Network, Inc., 3300 Holcomb Bridge Road, Suite 292,
Norcross, GA 30092;
Andrew Hicks, Registered Agent, Great American Financial Network, Inc., 3835
Mockingbird Drive, Vera Beach, FL 32963;
Jeffrey P. Coleman, Esq., 581 South Duncan Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756;
on this 6th day of March
, 2003
____________/s/__________
James H. Harris
FL Bar #817775
Attorney Supervisor
Office of Financial Institutions and Securities Regulation
Legal Services Office
Fletcher Building #526
200 East Gaines Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0379
850-410-9896
Copies furnished to:
Don B. Saxon, Director
Division of Securities

|